“Opponents of the renewal tenders argued that ICANN should award open-ended registration contracts to motivate administrators to invest in their registries. However, incumbents are encouraged to invest to preserve their competitive advantage in a situation of rebellion. Therefore, in the worst case, the innovative effect of a possible termination of a registry agreement is inconclusive. In addition, experience shows that any concern about the risk of transferring a new gTLD record after a rebid has no place. The management and operation of many GTLDs and ccTLDs have been successfully transferred, without placing an excessive burden on DNA stability or security. For example, in January 2003, VeriSign successfully transferred the .org record to the interest public registry. » Among the languages chosen for the transliterations: Thai, Deva, Korean (Hang), Chinese (Hant / Traditional & Hans / Simplified), Hebrew, Russian, Arabic, Japanese. The company`s two non-IDN applications are for .comsec and .verisign. Verisign revised its WLS proposals twice in response to public comments and discussions with Registrars and other organizations, on January 28, 2002 and March 20, 2002  Despite objections, ICANN authorized, on August 23, 2002, the renegotiation of Verisign`s .com and “net” registration agreement to include the corresponding changes for the implementation of LSD for the 12-month trial phases. The final subscription fee was 24 $US.  ICANN and Verisign have already negotiated the price of .com registrations until 2024, and there is no reason for ICANN to agree to a price change more than four years earlier.
The only explanation for ICANN`s deal is the $20 million kickback it will receive for violating its duty to its stakeholders in a secret behind-the-scenes deal it negotiated with Versigni. The ICA agreed with the Business Constituency, which has repeatedly asked ICANN to consult with community contributions before reaching a proposed agreement, failing which ICANN`s position is already well anchored and its direction is already defined, thus placing the cart before the horse. Instead, the agreement concluded that due to a “more dynamic DNS marketplace,” the annual price for registering and renewing Dotcom domain names can be changed as soon as VeriSign and the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, which controls the Internet`s address book, agree to modify the registry registry registration agreement to allow for price increases. This increase would limit increases to 7% compared to the highest possible price the previous year, with a two-year freeze schedule every six years. In March 2012, ICANN published a proposal to extend Verisign`s 2006 .com registration agreement.  Three months later, in June 2012, the ICANN Board took action against community proposals to approve .com Verisign registration agreement for a further seven years from its expiration on November 30, 2012. According to ICANN`s decision, Verisign should also have increased its registration fee by 7% over the next seven years, but this decision was changed by the Department of Commerce. Nevertheless, the new directive will result in Verisign paying ICANN a fee of $US 0.25 per .com registration, renewal or transfer, instead of the lump sums previously paid, which could bring ICANN additional revenue of $8 million per year.
  The initial decisions of the Board of Directors can be found here. . . .